On 13 November 2009 at 12:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Added CC to debian-release... | | On 13 November 2009 at 19:11, Iustin Pop wrote: | | On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:24:59AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | | > On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | | > | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | > | | > | > On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | | > | > | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | > | > | | > | > | > Package: libprotobuf-dev | | > | > | > Version: 2.1.0-1 | | > | > | > Severity: normal | | > | > | > | | > | > | > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on August 11. | | > | > | > It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this version. | | > | > | | | > | > | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, didn't have | | > | > | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. | | > | > | | > | > Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a | | > | > 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding | | > | > | | > | > usr/lib/pkgconfig/* | | > | > | | > | > to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. | | > | > | | > | > Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | | > | > NMU if you want. | | > | | | > | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | | > | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | | > | doing things properly :) | | > | | | > | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | | > | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | | > | ;-) | | > | | > I would like to a NMU with a proper delayed upload in the next few days. | | > Is that ok with you? I plan on raising the library name libprotobuf5. | | | | Yes please. Unfortunately I've been very busy lately, and will not be able to | | work on it for around two more weeks. | | | | But I'd recommend again talking with debian-release to make sure the library | | bump is coordinated. | | Besides bumping the library soname to libprotobuf5 (we already libprotobuf2, | ....3, and ...4) and adding the line to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install so | that the new pkg-config files get added, is there anything that | debian-release wants me to do?
Did you in the past alter the src/Makefile.am ? It has so-major 4 encoded: libprotobuf_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 4:0:0 but if I try to replace your 2.1 builds with the 2.2 builds I just made I it is NOT a transparent replacement. So we need a new major number that differs from upstream. Is that what you did before? Dirk | According to a quick 'rdepends' only one other package is currently using | this: | | ~> apt-cache rdepends libprotobuf4 | libprotobuf4 | Reverse Depends: | protobuf-c-compiler | mumble | mumble-server | protobuf-compiler | libprotoc4 | libprotobuf-dev | protobuf-c-compiler | ~> | | So we should be fine, right? | | Dirk | | -- | Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. | -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
