On Fri, Nov 06, 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Could you provide some examples of packages that might need this? I > would like to challenge the code changes by compiling "ugly hacks" > to make sure that the changes do not break anything.
Sure, gtk2-engines, libgweather, vte are built on similar hacks to have multiple configure/make/make install runs. > >That said, "dh" is also around now and might allow this more easily. > I still favor CDBS. You are free to abandon it, off course. :-) (I think I wouldn't rewrite CDBS packages in dh, nor start mixing dh packages in the middle of GNOME CDBS-based packages for new packages, but I slightly favor dh for new packages (unless CDBS provides an advantage).) -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
