On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 08:36:10AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 06 Nov 2009, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > What I can do however is add a supplementary option like > > > --create-empty-orig that would help bootstrap the process for your > > > specific case (that would not encourage repacking an upstream source > > > tree). > > > > Why not simply allow not to have any .orig.tar.gz at all ? I mean, there > > are other .orig.tar.gz files in his case, why insist on having an empty > > package_version.orig.tar.gz ? > > Because it's too late for such a design change IMO (and dak check for the > presence of the right files, etc).
That pretty much depends on what dak is expecting to be the right files. If it can handle the additional tarballs, doesn't it mean it properly parses the .dsc and/or .changes files ? And that it could cope with no tarball being package_version.orig.tar.gz ? (naive question) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
