Le Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:37:06AM +0200, Philipp Kern a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:42:02PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > nmu r-cran-epibasix_1.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new > > documentation format).' > > nmu r-other-mott-happy_2.1-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new > > documentation format).' > > nmu r-cran-colorspace_1.0.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new > > documentation format).' > > nmu r-cran-msm_0.9.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new > > documentation format).' > > nmu r-cran-sp_0.9.36-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new > > documentation format).' > > nmu r-cran-spc_0.21-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation > > format).' > > Done.
Thank you very much for your help. For some packages, like r-cran-epibasix, not much seems to happen. Is it just a question of not being prioritary in the build queues or is it indicating a problem? https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=r-cran-epibasix Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
