* Marc Haber > I still don't like that idea.
Why is that? Surely there's no need for Debian to be eccentric about the naming of the "exim" command any longer? The only real reason for "exim4" was the problem with the cronjobs and init scripts of the Woody "exim" package, right? > Please say why it isn't a fix for you to have /usr/local/bin/exim link > to /usr/sbin/exim4? I don't like to keep /usr/local in root's $PATH, for starters. It also feels unnecessary to have to work around the missing "exim" command, when I cannot any longer see any reason why it should be missing in the first place. It's not just me, either. Vh -- Tore Anderson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
