Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> writes: > Haa now that you ask I peeked into it in more details and found the > problem: The files are *the*same*. > > The point is that the original source is info.texi that is included in >the emcs package *and* the texinfo package (source) becasue it >documents both teh Emacs mode and the info reader itself. > > I checked, there are hardly any differences int he files, the one from > emacs are a bit newer but no significatn changes. > > How do we resolve that? I propose that we ship it only in the > texinfo-doc-nonfree > and you add a suggest in emacs to texinfo-doc-nonfree in addition to the > emacs23-common-non-dfsg. > > But if you have other suggestions I am open, please let me know! > > I don't want to start up some alternatives system, and shipping the > same info document two times is not necessary.
But what was the original problem, or was there any problem other than the existence of duplicate files? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
