Hi! [ Removing #516057 as it's a closed bug about a bison error. ]
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 18:19:51 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Can you please have a look at fixing the segfaults of iasl on non > i386/amd64 or do you think it would be better to remove the support of > iasl on non i386/amd64. If so, bochs is the only affected reverse dep of > iasl if you would restrict iasl to i386/amd64. I don't see why iasl would not be able to run on any architecture, it's just a compiler for byte-code. We ported it some time ago, but it seems it has regressed in the latest upload (probably problems with unaligned accesses or little endian assumptions, as before). I might try to take a look at fixing it, but not now. Anyway regarding bochs, it's not really a problem as iasl is only used when building architecture independent packages, thus the Build-Depends-Indep. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
