On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:09:13 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:17:02 +0200 Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: > > > Hi, > > two new versions of pbuilder have been uploaded to unstable without > > incorporating my patch to fix bug #526471. > > > > What's wrong with my patch? > > If it was rejected, I would like to know why, so that I can possibly > > prepare a new rectified patch... > > > > May I have some sort of response from the Debian pbuilder maintenance > > team? > > > > > > In the meanwhile, I am sending a new cleaned up version of my patch > > (prepared against the current public git repository). > > Please apply it as soon as possible. > > > > N.B.: as indicated in the patch itself, my changes are released > > under the same terms as pbuilder (GPL v2 or later). > > > Again, may I have a reply from the Debian pbuilder maintenance team?
It seems that I do not even deserve an answer... :-( This is *really* frustrating! How am I supposed to contribute to pbuilder, if nobody even cares to reply to bug reports submitted along with patches?!? -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! http://www.inventati.org/frx ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpzn1FyPBr7j.pgp
Description: PGP signature