On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 08:42 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:40:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:50 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:38:12AM +0100, kevin wrote: > > > > Message #15 received at 533...@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox): > > > > > > Thanks for this. I had a report from the OP by PM that this patch didn't > > > help. > > > > > > It works for you? > > > > > > Ross, Could you try this again? > > > > > > Mark > > Which patch are you referring to? I tried several different ones, and > > then you wanted me to do some profiling, but I got hung up on its > > needing sid. > > Yes. Then I received a follow up PM from Kevin saying the patch fixed it > for him. I think he meant the patch in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533830#15 > > Mark He said that too in private communication. I retried it and it did not help; I'm getting virtually 100% CPU useage both during aptitude update and during actual package upgrades.
Details: mostly Lenny system. 1. delete my old source directories. 2. apt-get source apt-cacher. 3. apply patch. It didn't take automatically; I did it manually. 4. r...@corn:/usr/local/src/tools/apt-cacher-1.6.8$ dch -n 1.6.8rb3 Retry original patch. dch warning: your current directory has been renamed to: ../apt-cacher-1.6.8+nmu1 5.time dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -D 6. dpkg -i ... as root. Run aptitude. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
