Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:18:45AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> IMO I really think that packages should use the init.d script instead >> of rely @reboot, allowing @reboot only for sysadmin: better to have a >> unique method for "init.d"-like scripts, and to use the full features >> of new booting system. But in this case we doesn't need @reboot in the >> policy. > I agree that packages should not use @reboot, and that therefore there is > little point in mentionning it in policy. Well, I think Raphael was also arguing that it would be nice for any package that provides the virtual package to also provide that feature. Although given that the one package that wants to provide that virtual package in addition to the normal cron daemon doesn't support it, that does seem like too strong of a requirement at the moment if we're going forward with defining a virtual package. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
