Sorry to have not been able to help with this more. I'm still recovering from a particularly nasty bout of stomach flu. :/
Faidon Liambotis <parav...@debian.org> writes: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> (It's odd that the original package FTBFSes, but well...) > It is, I was wondering myself. It had multiple serious bugs actually: > - tries to generate the certificates with openssl without having > openssl as a build-dep, > - even if it's installed (i.e. in an unclean chroot), they are > generated in /etc/shibboleth instead of DESTDIR, > - then, debian/rules tries to rm (without -f) them in debian/tmp/, but > they were never there so it fails/FTBFS. This is disturbing to me as well. I build all packages in a chroot as a matter of course, and didn't have any trouble with the build. The keys that were generated as part of the normal build process aren't particularly useful in the context of a Debian package, so when I saw them being generated, I just removed them, but I thought they were being generated under DESTDIR. I'm not at all sure why you were seeing different results than I was. I will definitely investigate. It may be that I missed something because I was building in a chroot as a non-root user and therefore writing to /etc/shibboleth in the chroot was failing and I didn't notice that error. Thank you very much for fixing this, and as soon as I have focus again, I'll make sure that the packages in unstable are also fixed if needed. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
