[Simon Josefsson] > What if some service depends on the "shishid" service (not likely > but maybe possible?).
There is no package in debian depending on the existing provides, according to <URL:http://lintian.debian.org/~pere/test-20091006.log>. > Is this possible: > > # Provides: shishi-kdc shishid Yes, this is possible. > Even if it is possible, and we'd use it, I wonder when it would be safe > to remove the 'shishid' part. Keeping 'shishid' in the Provides: may > result in people starting to use it. So maybe it is simpler to just > change 'shishid' to 'shishi-kdc' and deal with any breakage separately > now rather than later. I agree that this is a better approach, given that no one depend on that script at the moment. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
