Hi, On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:01:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > But anyways, why don't we keep the old directory as a symlink to the new
Because the dir is still poplulated by files (well, symlinks) to ease partial upgrades. We can't jus throw them away right now unless wchange all dicts again... And anyway, who should own this symlink? dictionaries-common might have been a candidate, but it's far too late now (I'll now go throug the hassle of NMUing most dicts myself). Why didn't you suggest that when the plan was outlined :) > one, so that it doesn't make backporting harder ? That is a reason, but then again you can also make backports of this with the current thing (ifeqs in rules, debian/rules control target before the build, ..) Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
