On 04/10/09 at 21:34 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > archive, and the only problem I've heard of is with piuparts, whose > > dependencies analyzer isn't particularly well written. > > I think piupart simply use 'apt-get dist-upgrade -f'
The part of piuparts that chooses which package to test next (on piuparts.d.o) does that based on a dependency analyzer written from scratch in python. > > Also, the solution to make redmine only recommends: redmine-db* is > > clearly wrong, and should not be chosen. The most correct solution would > > be to drop the dependency in redmine-db*, and make it crystal clear (in > > the description) that those packages only provide the list of deps. > > This is another way, but that might require to rename the remine-db packages, > which is anoying. Well, that's the only way, no? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
