On Sat, 03 Oct 2009, David Henningsson wrote: > Package: freepats > Version: 20060219-1 > Severity: minor > > Freepats claims, in its debian/control description, that it is "the sole > DFSG-compliant patch set in existence so far". But package > "fluid-soundfont-gm" is a patch set and must be DFSG, or it wouldn't be > in Debian's main repository. So the claim seems false to me.
Thanks for the report. However, if fluid is working well, wouldn't it make more sense to outright remove freepats from the archive? Can you give me your impression about freepats and fluid? Is there any situation where one should prefer freepats over fluid? Because if there isn't one, I think we should remove freepats. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
