Serafeim Zanikolas <ser...@hellug.gr> writes: > The tag maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-update-inetd recommends to > depend on either inet-superserver or update-inetd, when it fact the > later is redundant (a dependency on inet-superserver indirectly > satisfies the update-inetd dependency)
I don't understand this problem report. The recommendation is to depend on one or the other, since some packages don't require inetd be running, only that update-inetd be available for postinst to use. What specific problem do you believe needs to be fixed? > Number of packages affected: > $ cat > /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.be.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages > | grep-dctrl -F Depends update-inetd -a --not -F Provides inet-superserver -s > Package | wc -l > 41 This search doesn't make any sense to me. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
