Le lundi 28 septembre 2009 à 07:50 +0900, Ryo IGARASHI a écrit : > Thank you for the quick feedback. You are welcome.
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> > wrote: > > So, what do you think should be the solution here ? > > * move cblas.h to /usr/include/atlas (for now, my favorite) > > * leave only headers like in the previous package: > > http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/all/libatlas-headers/filelist > > These two will be an easy solution. However, almost all cBLAS-using > software includes not <atlas/cblas.h> but <cblas.h>, building user > software with installing only libatlas-dev and not libblas-dev will fail. For now, in the current atlas packaging, there is no cblas.h file... Therefor, I doubt there is much packages using it. > Well, the interface defined in cblas.h is standard, so ATLAS will > properly works with cblas.h from libblas-dev. > > > * use the alternative system > > I prefer this option. As mentioned above, preference of libblas-dev > should be higher than that of atlas provided version. The user of this > header file will be very happy when this alternative usage is mentioned > in README.Debian. OK. Ondrej (as libblas-dev maintainer), what is your opinion on this ? > > * add a conflicts ;) > > This should be the last option ;) Indeed. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
