[Marco d'Itri]
> It's mdadm which needs to be fixed.
What need to be fixed in mdadm? I find this changelog entry for udev
mentioning mdadm, but it do not explain what need to be changed.
udev (146-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
+ vol_id and libvolume_id have been removed. (Closes: #500883, #534765)
Breaks: dmsetup (<< 2.02.51-1), mdadm (<< 3.0-3)
+ Introduced libgudev-1.0.
+ Finally removed the udevinfo compatibility symlink.
+ Applies ACLs on /dev nodes if ConsoleKit is active.
* Added patch test_for_glib: do not run udev-acl unless glib is installed.
* Stop copying /etc/udev/rules.d/ in the initramfs.
* Renamed some rules files for uniformity with other distributions:
50-udev.rules => 50-udev-default.rules,
95-late.rules => 95-udev-late.rules.
-- Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:50:20 +0200
Can you provide a patch to fix whatever needs fixing in mdadm? I
suspect this report is about the same issue as #541884, can you
confirm this?
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
