Package: tex-common
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: normal
In some discussion about the entries for the map files Hans Hagen
suggsted the following:
=============================================
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:50:01 +0200
From: Hans Hagen
To: Karl Berry
Subject: Re: [tex-live] Re: Proposal for a tex-base package
[...]
anyhow, the more generic approach is then:
TEXFONTMAPS =
.;$TEXMF/fonts/map/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//;$TEXMF/{$progname,pdftex,dvips}/{
+config,}//
ENCFONTS =
.;$TEXMF/fonts/enc/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//;$TEXMF/{$progname,pdftex,dvips}/{
+config,}//
or cleaner:
TEXFONTMAPS = .;$TEXMF/{fonts/map,}/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//
ENCFONTS = .;$TEXMF/{fonts/enc,}/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//
i.e. there is no reason to limit this to dvips
Hans
=============================================
What do you think about adjusting the entries in tex-common for this? It
is a superset of the ones currently in tex-common.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc3-mm1
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.52 Debian configuration management sy
ii ucf 2.000 Update Configuration File: preserv
tex-common recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
