On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 07:05:51AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > reopen 535177 0.6.29 > quit > > crap I'm an idiot. I don't even understand what I did wrong. it worked > fine for me while I was testing it. for now, I'll just revert the > change altogether (since it was half done only anyways, ugh). > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:00:39 +0200 > > Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > with or without severity war, the --svn-tag-only option is critical for > > > the operation of several packaging teams. I think this is why Luca set > > > the severity to serious despite the apparent lack of impact. > > > > > > It is currently required to downgrade to do any kind of work with > > > svn-bp. > > > > Is --svn-tag not sufficient, albeit taking more time to do the task? > > > > > Thanks for considering, > > > > I appreciate that and I'll get an upload ready just as soon as I get > > time. > > > > Is it okay for me to upload Neil? (apparently I now have DD powers :)) >
eh, I'll just go for it. Please feel free to yell at me later. ;) -- _________________________ Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
