* Adrian Lang <deb...@adrianlang.de> [2009-09-23 02:50-0400]: > Hi Micah, > > On Tue, September 22, 2009 10:40 pm, Micah Anderson wrote: > > Do you think that the following change to the control file would be > > sufficient: > > > > Index: debian/control > > =================================================================== > > --- debian/control (revision 4156) > > +++ debian/control (working copy) > > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > > - apache2-mpm-worker, libapr1-dev, rubygems (>= 1.2), debhelper (>= 5.0.44), > > + apache2-mpm-worker | apache2-mpm-prefork, libapr1-dev, rubygems (>= 1.2), > > debhelper (>= 5.0.44), > > ruby-dev, doxygen, asciidoc (>= 8.2), graphviz, rake, cdbs, > > source-highlight > > as long as there is no special reason to prohibit the usage of prefork.
I got the impression, from your original bug report, that there was no reason to prohibit the use of prefork. Are you saying that you aren't sure that it actually *does* work? micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
