On Monday August 31, robe...@debath.co.uk wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > Why specify it in the first place? I suggest to remove all metadata=
> > stuff from mdadm.conf. Inspect the /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf output.
>
> I didn't.
>
> It got added automatically... Bug?
Bug somewhere. No idea where though, mdadm definitely wouldn't emit
"metadata=0.9".
metadata=1 should work since 2.6.4, and possibly even before then.
metadata=0.9 would never work. It is a version number, not a decimal
number. metadata=0.90 is correct and totally different from
metadata=0.9
Do you have any idea what "upgrade script" put "metadata=0.9" in
there?
NeilBrown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
