Daniel Burrows <dburr...@debian.org> wrote: > What does the version of aptitude in experimental do here?
(with packages with slightly changed depends) The following packages have unmet dependencies: texlive-base: Conflicts: texlive-base-bin but it is not installable texlive-latex-recommended: Conflicts: texlive-base-bin but it is not installable The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Upgrade the following packages: texlive-base [2007.dfsg.2-4 (unstable, now) -> 2009~svn14580-1~1 (tl2009-pre)] texlive-latex-recommended [2007.dfsg.2-4 (unstable, now) -> 2009~svn14580-1~1 (tl2009-pre)] Score is -10 So the only change is that now the <NULL> is replaced by the name of the private repository. Which *does* help me, since it tells me that the repository "http://localhost tl2009-pre/" is taken, not "http://localhost experimental/main", probably because of the experimental. Or not. # cat /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin: release a=experimental Pin-Priority: 600 # apt-cache policy texlive-base texlive-base: Installed: 2007.dfsg.2-4 Candidate: 2009~svn14580-1~4 Version table: 2009~svn14580-1~4 0 500 http://localhost experimental/main Packages 2009~svn14580-1~1 0 500 http://localhost tl2009-pre/ Packages *** 2007.dfsg.2-4 0 500 http://localhost sid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status # aptitude full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following packages are BROKEN: texlive-base texlive-latex-recommended The following NEW packages will be installed: fragmaster{a} libkpathsea5{a} luatex{a} texlive-binaries{a} texlive-doc-si{a} texlive-lang-arabic{a} texlive-lang-latvian{a} texlive-lang-lithuanian{a} texlive-luatex{a} The following packages will be REMOVED: dvipdfmx{u} lcdf-typetools{u} libkpathsea-dev{u} tex4ht{u} tex4ht-common{u} texlive-base-bin{a} texlive-lang-arab{u} texlive-lang-manju{u} The following packages will be upgraded: context lmodern tex-common texlive-bibtex-extra texlive-common texlive-doc-base texlive-doc-bg texlive-doc-cs+sk texlive-doc-de texlive-doc-el texlive-doc-en texlive-doc-es texlive-doc-fi texlive-doc-fr texlive-doc-it texlive-doc-ja texlive-doc-ko texlive-doc-mn texlive-doc-nl texlive-doc-pl texlive-doc-pt texlive-doc-ru texlive-doc-th texlive-doc-tr texlive-doc-uk texlive-doc-vi texlive-doc-zh texlive-extra-utils texlive-font-utils texlive-fonts-extra texlive-fonts-extra-doc texlive-fonts-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended-doc texlive-formats-extra texlive-full texlive-games texlive-generic-extra texlive-generic-recommended texlive-humanities texlive-humanities-doc texlive-lang-african texlive-lang-armenian texlive-lang-croatian texlive-lang-cyrillic texlive-lang-czechslovak texlive-lang-danish texlive-lang-dutch texlive-lang-finnish texlive-lang-french texlive-lang-german texlive-lang-greek texlive-lang-hebrew texlive-lang-hungarian texlive-lang-indic texlive-lang-italian texlive-lang-latin texlive-lang-mongolian texlive-lang-norwegian texlive-lang-other texlive-lang-polish texlive-lang-portuguese texlive-lang-spanish texlive-lang-swedish texlive-lang-tibetan texlive-lang-ukenglish texlive-lang-vietnamese texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-base-doc texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-extra-doc texlive-latex-recommended-doc texlive-latex3 texlive-math-extra texlive-metapost texlive-metapost-doc texlive-music texlive-omega texlive-pictures texlive-pictures-doc texlive-plain-extra texlive-pstricks texlive-pstricks-doc texlive-publishers texlive-publishers-doc texlive-science texlive-science-doc texlive-xetex The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: ghostscript lacheck latex-cjk-all latex-sanskrit prosper ps2eps texpower tipa ttf-freefont ttf-gfs-artemisia ttf-gfs-baskerville ttf-gfs-bodoni-classic ttf-gfs-didot-classic ttf-gfs-gazis ttf-gfs-neohellenic ttf-gfs-solomos ttf-gfs-theokritos ttf-sil-gentium xindy 89 packages upgraded, 9 newly installed, 8 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 904MB of archives. After unpacking 625MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: texlive-base: Conflicts: texlive-base-bin but it is not installable texlive-latex-recommended: Conflicts: texlive-base-bin but it is not installable The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Upgrade the following packages: texlive-base [2007.dfsg.2-4 (unstable, now) -> 2009~svn14580-1~1 (tl2009-pre)] texlive-latex-recommended [2007.dfsg.2-4 (unstable, now) -> 2009~svn14580-1~1 (tl2009-pre)] Score is -10 Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] Why does it not try to upgrade to 1~4 which apt-cache says is a candidate? BTW, "apt-get dist-upgrade" does not complain about any problems. And it currently downloads the correct 1~4 version, while aptitude didn't (I just looked it up in a logfile from this morning). Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
