On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I did a test to see how dependency based boot sequencing handle tries > to both enable and disable a service for a given runlevel. The > disabling take effect, while the enablind is ignored.
This is a very sane thing to do, but we should still bitch to all heck that the dependency information is broken. This would do well as a lintian test, I think. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
