On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:21:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Here are two minor control file fixes:
> > - capitalize Debian as applicable in the long description;
> 
> When I refer to "debian packages" in the description, I am not referring
> to the distribution with that proper name; I am refering to the package
> format. It is appropriate not to capitalize debian in that usage.

Oh.  Right.  Accepted, and sorry for the noise :)

> > - move "file" and "man-db" to B-D-I and add a lintian source override
> >   because "po4a" is really used in the "clean" target even though
> >   lintian can't see it
> 
> AFAIK, there is no reason to use B-D-I unless both arch all and any
> packages are built from the source package, and the arch all package has
> some hairy binary-indep dependency that does not need to be installed on
> all the buildds. This is why lintian does not warn if an arch all
> package uses only B-D.

Well, the problem is that I decided to do both of these - the capitalization
fixes and the B-D -> B-D-I change - exactly because lintian *did* issue
information notices when I built debhelper to test my dh_installcatalogs
change.  Maybe something is different in our environments?  I'm running
Squeeze (updated every day) with debian-policy and lintian pinned from
unstable; right now I have lintian-2.2.14, and it warned about the three
packages in B-D in both my squeeze environment and my sid chroot, and
http://lintian.debian.org/full/jo...@debian.org.html#debhelper
also seems to agree.

Maybe it didn't warn about those at some time in the past, but
I distinctly remember fixing such problems in my arch-all packages of
various Perl modules.

Oh... I think I see it now - it's just that it's an information notice,
not a warning or an error.  In that case, it might be that it's your
call to decide to ignore it - and if so, sorry for the wasted time
again, and thanks for your response!  Should I close the bug, or will you?

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  r...@ringlet.net    r...@space.bg    r...@freebsd.org
PGP key:        http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence 
wouldn't be false.

Attachment: pgpTAg6KMqOzD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to