Hi,
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 06:34 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in two
> > weeks, so I will proceed with the NMU.
>
>
> ...or not..:-)
>
> root-system FTBFS (#529998)
The patch attached to the bug report does indeed fix the problem.
My main problem right now, is that I'm on vacation for the next month
and even thought I do have a network connection - I'll be in no position
to work on the packages.
> and I don't have the skills to fix
> this. So, unless the maitnainer fixes the FTBFS *and* updates l10n,
> there is no chance that the package gets its l10n bugs fixed soon.
I suggest that you just apply the posted fix and use that as part of
your NMU release. I see no harm in that.
What other issues might you have?
Yours,
--
___ | Christian Holm Christensen
|_| | -------------------------------------------------------------
| | Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 4 Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91
_| DK-2200 Copenhagen N Cell: (+45) 24 61 85 91
_| Denmark Office: (+45) 353 25 447
____| Email: ch...@nbi.dk Web: http://cern.ch/cholm
| |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
