On Sun, 06 Sep 2009, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > It mean that the migration is blocked by package foo, which is removed > but not purged and thus have left behind a script in /etc/init.d. :)
Well, the message says "package FOO removed *by* not purged" instead of "package FOO is removed *but* not purged". The current wording confuses even me :) > Will need proposals on how to make these messages easier to > understand. Any ideas? "script for package FOO disabled because the package was removed but not purged", "package FOO is removed but not purged, has inactive initscripts which were ignored", etc. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
