Matt Johnston <m...@ucc.asn.au> writes:

> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:18:16PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
>> FHS:
>> 
>>     
>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#ETCHOSTSPECIFICSYSTEMCONFIGURATION
>>     "The /etc hierarchy contains configuration files. A "configuration
>>     file" is a local file used to control the operation of a program; it
>>     must be static and cannot be an executable binary."
>
> Interesting. Wouldn't that preclude all of /etc/init.d and
> /etc/default?

To my knowledge /etc/default is used for standard configuration files in
Debian. The case of /etc/init.d/ can be considered product of de facto
history.

I think the FHS's purpose was prevent scattering executables around the
/etc (other than /etc/init.d) to improve better management; separating
code from their control (mount & disk management in general).

Likewise separate directory for the logs.

Jari



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to