On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 04:30:42PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:34:22 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:42:50AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> severity 318431 wishlist > > > Manoj, that is crass behavior, you could at least have made some > > comment on the bug or something, not this. I mean now sarge is out, > > and we are here in helsinki trying to move things forward with the > > new kernel infrastructure, and you come and void all this work > > without even bothering to make a single comment, thanks all the > > same. > > So don't inflate bug severities in your reportsd. I know you > have an inflated sense of importance of your own packages, but that > does not justify filing every single bug report as important. Talk > about crass behaviour.
Like the powerpc kernel packages ? > In this particular case, you are asking for a feature > enhancement to kernel-package to address a tool chain feature that > is not even in place yet. This is a wishlist. Nope, i am asking for the other change as well, which enables to have self generated packages include the mkvmlinuz support stuff. As well as a new target for ppc32, which will allow us to build kernels without having to clean up the mess that is generated by the current insane powerpc situation in kernel-package ? > As to the rest of the idiotic polemics in this message, how > does deflating the bug severity in any way impact the oh-so-important > work you are doing in Helsinki? You may have the habit of ignoring Well, the way it was done, showed you had no interest in handling the package, and considered it a minor inconvenience, as you mentioned above, while i really need it for the 2.6.12 kernel release, which dilinger want to do this evening yet (too late for the kernel-package change i know, but well). > non-important bug reports (which would explain a lot, actually), but > I don't. And, at any rate, in practical terms, the rate at wqhich > this bug shall be addressed has not changed: I alsways mentally > discount bug severities that you report. Thanks, all the same. Tell me when lastly i have submitted a bug report of wrong severity to kernel-package ? And what basis you have for making such accusations ? > ps: well, you asked me to make comments. I had hoped you can take a > hint, but hey. So, when are you going to apply the patch ? Also i had asked on comment on the patch, not insulting comments on my person like you did above, so is this a hint that we cannot count on you to work in an integrated way with the kernel-team in the future, or what ? I mean, kernel-package is currently a mess and we all know that and you have planed a big rewrite, but will you do that in your own way totally ignoring us and being insulting ? Or what have we to expect ? Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
