2009/9/3 Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org>: > On jeu, 2009-09-03 at 13:15 +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote: >> As it is now, xflock4 doesn't check for the presence of xlock, which isn't >> guaranteed to be present on the system. > > Yeah, it's not really grave to be honest. What if it fails? It's the > last one anyway :)
Not a big deal, but this way it throws a sensible error message; otherwise it looks that xlock is the only option (the error message now is xlock: no such file or directory) > I'm not really sure I want to recommend xtrlock usage considering it's > not really intended to hide the screen. It's the last fallback option anyway, so the alternative is leaving the screen unlocked... of course there's no need of a package dependency, people will have to willingly install it, so they will be conscious of it shortcomings. The best solution would be to have it configurable, but I think it's overkill - it's just locking the screen, every available program that does it should be ok. Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
