Hi, On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:43:23AM +0800, Michael Deegan wrote: > > And why did you do that NOW? 3.0.1-9 is LOOOONG gone. > > > > > > Well, not as long gone as 2.4.1. :P
Well, 2.4.1 isn't gone, it's in stable :P > If it makes you more comfortable, I get a similar result when upgrading > > from the 2.4.1 in stable: Bvut only if you "upgrade" via apt-get install, a dist-upgrade works last time I tried it when a similar bug came.... > > ARGH. If you use unstable or testing (see below), why not just use > > dist-upgrade > > instead of apt-get'ing every package? > > Because a dist-upgrade wants to uninstall a bunch of KDE packages (thanks > to xine), and install the new dependencies of held packages. Either you use stable or you use testing. Live with it, and wtf don't you just use lenny-backports for OOo? That even is more up-to-date then squeeze.... > is effectively all lenny with selected bits of squeeze. I'm pretty sure the Why? -> backports. > IMHO mixed distributions are sometimes good for catching missing > dependencies. And also for bogus reports :-). That's why I try people to have sane systems... In any case, what we could do is making openoffice.org-common depend on a) ure, not problematic b) openoffice.org-core. That would result in a circular dependency because -core obviously depends on -common. APT will break that up and install either one first and that won't help us in this case when the "wrong" one first Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
