retitle 543944 don't claim munin-node has been started if it hasn't severity 543944 minor thanks
Hi Toni, thanks for your bugreport. Tom already replied to it, but didn't cc: you, so I quote his mail here for you. (Tom, mails to 123...@bugs.d.o are not automatically cc:ed to the submitter, you have to explicitly cc: 123456-submit...@bugs.d.o for that. (Or cc: the person directly as I do here..)) On Freitag, 28. August 2009, Tom Feiner wrote: > Looks like you're running into the problem described here: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539886. right. So for 543944 we can ignore this aspect of the bugreport. > Regarding the starting of munin-node, why do you think it shouldn't be > started after installation? The munin-node postinst script uses invoke-rc.d > which obeys runlevel and other locally-defined constraints. I guess because Toni saw this: > > + invoke-rc.d munin-node start > > Starting Munin-Node: done. which is actually a lie, munin-node wasn't restarted as Tom explained... so it would be nice if postinst wouldnt lie to the user :) (Not sure how to achieve that and it's certainly a minor cosmetic issue.) regards, Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
