On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:10:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Firstly, at this point I am thoroughly convinced that something like > this patch is necessary, and I think the tone being taken with the > original submitter has been out of order; driving people away from > making improvements to d-i is not what we want to do, considering our > limited developer base! Yes, we should make sure that patches are > necessary, since all maintenance has a cost, but we should also > demonstrate a little more respect for the judgement of our fellow > developers and remember that there is a substantial difference in tone > between "I'm trying to understand why this is needed" and "huge NACK", > even if we are stressed out trying to produce something releaseable.
Thanks Colin. I see that you're already on track on getting the implementation details right. I don't think I'm the most indicate to comment on your changes to partman internals, but I remain at your disposal in case there's any doubts about the GRUB side of things that need be resolved. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
