On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:01:21PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Robert Millan <r...@aybabtu.com> (22/08/2009): > > > As the failing build is examples/echo/echo-server.cpp, I assumed a > > > quick and dirty workaround might do, see the attached patch. FWIW, > > > the _POSIX_HOST_NAME_MAX #define is in > > > /usr/include/bits/posix1_lim.h, included through limits.h. > > > This looks wrong. > > As I said, it is a *quick and dirty /workaround/*. > > > It should be using sysconf() like the comment above suggests. If > > you disagree with what the comment says, you should be providing > > HOST_NAME_MAX via limits.h. > > I didn't implement using sysconf() because of time constraints and > lack of interest in fixing an *example* to use sysconf() for a random > package that FTBFSes while there are many others left. > > So: I don't disagree with… what I was previously saying.
No need to grumpy. As I said before: > Otherwise, let me know and I'll fix it to use sysconf() instead, it's a > pretty easy fix. I'll make a good fix, send it to upstream and include it in next upload. Thanks -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
