Hello, On šeštadienis 22 Rugpjūtis 2009 00:51:22 Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Sorry, this is *realy* the wrong way. > This package has been uploaded to Debian, so you have to support it, > also if upstream does not accept bugs for it, you still could > > a) mail them the issue and hope the best > b) answer and leave it opened until it has been fixed > > It is not my job as a *user* of this package to track all upstream > activities of this packages, I have got enough packages to maintain, so > on enough work..
Where did I ask you to track anything? It was more like if don't like it, don't use it. Yes, this package is (!) EXPERIMENTAL (!) for this very reason and won't see the light of unstable any time soon unless upstream releases something meaning they settled down rather than started rewriting the whole thing again. Given very clear description and disclaimers what experimental is, I don't think it is disrespectful for me to ask you to wait a bit until reports can really help to improve the software. I would rather tell users the truth than let the bug rot. Don't go to experimental expecting the same support as in unstable. Having all this said, if you want the bug open, this is your right to have it. However, until this network-manager-kde becomes at least unstable material (or goes away as its future is not even decided atm), don't expect the bug to be reacted upon. You are welcome to check again when the package will be aimed for normal use. It IS hard to check if breakages of half-baked software are fixed in the final version. -- Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
