Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal
'pngcheck' deals with images to display information and to check integrity. As a maintainer I concur with the bug #358132 where user requested section change from devel => graphics. Jari ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Archive Administrator <instal...@ftp-master.debian.org> Subject: pngcheck override disparity To: Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net>, a...@debian.org Date: 2 hours, 38 minutes -- 2009-08-13 06:47 EEST Message-Id: <e1mbrhs-0001pc...@ries.debian.org> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): pngcheck_2.0.0-2_amd64.deb: package says section is graphics, override says devel. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
