On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Reinhard Tartler<siret...@tauware.de> wrote: > Dan Dennedy <d...@dennedy.org> writes: > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Reinhard Tartler<siret...@tauware.de> >> wrote: > >>> Thanks. Is someone able to reproduce this bug with ffplay? I've tried, >>> but didn't manage to create segfaults out of it. >> >> No, it did not segfault for me either, but it did become unresponsive. > > this is normal behavior. ffplay does not quit automatically at end of > file, but you can exit it with pressing 'q'.
No shit. This is not what I was talking about. I resent the condescending tone you take with someone who actually writes code against the ffmpeg libs. Try clicking around on the window. Seeking into the first 3 playable seconds of this 10 minute clip fails. >> MLT does not pass data to libavformat other than filename, timestamp, >> context pointer, and flags. Libavformat is inherently handling the >> file reading. > > Hm, this answer surprises me. My understanding of ffplay is that it is a > very thin wrapper around avformat and avcodec. > >> In any case, while the analysis might be interesting for >> some, before I put any more of my time into it, because I am quite >> confident it will result in a patch for libavformat, I must know >> whether you are more interested in patching FFmpeg v0.5 and thereby >> maintaining your own branch of FFmpeg or just upgrading the package >> from upstream sometime in the near future. > > I have no plans to stop tracking the 0.5 release branch, so yes, we'd > need a patch for the 0.5 release. In fact, the 0.5 release branch *is* > updated with updates, and there is even a 0.5.1 release in the pipe. And do you think you are more qualified to maintain FFmpeg than the FFmpeg project itself? -- +-DRD-+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
