Yavor Doganov wrote: > Gürkan Sengün wrote: > > > If there are 0.16.x point releases, we'll upload them. 0.17.x > > > are unstable and won't be packaged. > > > > I really wish we could go with the latest tarballs of GNUstep,
> You mean that we should not wait for "stable" even-numbered releases > and incrementally upload every release? This didn't make much sense > in the past, when upstream were releasing identical (say) 0.12.0 and > 0.13.0, with the former getting regular bugfix micro releases. > But now that they're changing the release policy slightly, maybe we > can do that. And there's not much difference in stability between > an even and odd-numbered release, IMHO. Perhaps it is a good idea > to discuss this on gnustep-dev. > I agree with you that having the newest is the best for the majority > of the users. > > would it be possible to have them at least in experimental? > This is not going to help users much, as due to the soname bumps > every dependent package has to be rebuilt... > > I'm also interested having the latest tarballs of GNUstep packaged > > in Debian, since I need them for the http://livecd.gnustep.org/ > Ack. So I suggest that we upload gnustep-make and gnustep-base > (1.19.1) in sid, gnustep-gui 0.17.1 in experimental, then ask > debian-release for another transition, and upload it to sid once we > have green light from them. Does this sound good? Yes, this sound good for me! :) -- Regards, Paul Chany http://csanyi-pal.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
