On 2009-08-05 09:32:59 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The repository was regenerated from a dump file. When the file was > added to the repository, it already had an Id keyword. So, I assume > that $Id: lplain.bst,v 4.0 2000/01/31 18:11:53 vlefevre Exp $ is in > the dump file (the data are compressed, so that this is just a guess), > and that "svnadmin load" didn't canonicalize the $Id$ keyword in the > repository (or is that the job of the client when updating the working > copy?). I don't know the reason why the dump file doesn't just have > $Id$. Maybe because of an old Subversion bug. But Subversion must be > able to handle the data that old versions have generated.
In fact, canonicalizing the $Id$ keyword would not be the correct solution, because when the Id keyword is removed, one should get the orignal data back (instead of $Id$), here $Id: lplain.bst,v 4.0 2000/01/31 18:11:53 vlefevre Exp $ -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
