Hi,
because of the leaked upcoming 9.8 version and someone made a diff to 9.7.
http://pastebin.com/f3e07714e
I think I found out which change helps to close this bug.
changing KCL_flush_tlb_one which is seen in the kernel stack trace seems to do
it:
-void ATI_API_CALL KCL_flush_tlb_one(void *va)
+static void kcl_flush_tlb_one(void *va)
{
unsigned long *addr = (unsigned long *)va;
__flush_tlb_one(*addr);
-2315,11 +2372,12 @@
* kernel < 2.6.27, on_each_cpu has 4 parameters.
* kernel >= 2.6.27, on_each_cpu has 3 parameters (removed the "retry"
parameter)
*/
-#if defined(__x86_64__) && (defined(__SMP__) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)) &&
(LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,25))
+#if ( defined(__x86_64__) && (defined(__SMP__) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)) &&
(LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,25))) || \
+ (!defined(__x86_64__) && (defined(__SMP__) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)) &&
(LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,29)))
# if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,27))
- on_each_cpu(KCL_flush_tlb_one, &va, 1, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(kcl_flush_tlb_one, &va, 1, 1);
# else
- on_each_cpu(KCL_flush_tlb_one, &va, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(kcl_flush_tlb_one, &va, 1);
# endif
#else
Bye Henning
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
