On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Do I understand correctly, that atm you are "only" getting all > packages ready for the switcht, but that the switch itself is still an > issue for the future and should not happen yet?
Yes, converted packages would be rejected by dak at the moment. > Ok, I know this problem but was explicitly asked by my (previous) > mentors to do it this way (see below). Even mentors do mistakes and/or do not know everything. :) > Please note that even on stable the referenced file explicitly asks > for this behaviour. I attached my new debian/rules as reference. Could > you have a look if it indeed helps? With this debian/rules the package > builds as explained in your bug report. On stable, this file says something that is no more accurate indeed. I filed a bug report to get this updated... > Btw. is autoreconf really necessary? AFAIK it's recommended to get always the latest build machinery but it's not mandatory... usually it's the work of upstream to keep it updated but many uptream do not care because they do not use newer architectures. > ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" "" > mv config.sub config.sub.upstream > cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub > endif You might want to avoid doing this twice... so only do it if config.sub.upstream does not exist. Same for config.guess. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
