Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 23:59:25, Max Bowsher a écrit : > Hi, Hi Max,
Thanks for your bug report. > As your package does not build GCJ native code, please amend your > Build-Depends from default-jdk-builddep to default-jdk. > > This will allow GCJ to not be pulled in at build-time on architectures > or distros where GCJ is not the default-jdk. I've seen your mail [1] on debian-java regarding choice between default-jdk- builddep and default-jdk. To my knownledge, your position haven't reached consensus and is not reflected in Debian Java Policy. In Debian, default-jdk-builddep package [2] as exactly the same dependency chain as default-jdk [3] : (gcj-jdk). On Ubuntu, default-jdk is openjdk-6-jdk and default-jdk-builddep is default- jdk + gcj-jdk At the moment, your issue is more a disagrement on Java Policy between Debian and Ubuntu. I would prefer to : - wait for a new Debian Java Policy (after Debconf9 ?) - resync Debian and Ubuntu Java Policy about default-* packages - fix Build-Depends on all packages [4] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2009/07/msg00013.html [2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk-builddep [3] http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk [4] 31 packages use default-jdk-builddep in unstable Cheers, -- Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
