On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:50:46AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > (and Marc can provide his counterpart) > > We would appreciate, however, if people would aid in getting the > standardization process under way as soon as possible. This needs to > be in policy, the sooner the better.
Based on this, I think that debian-policy is the appropriate place to deal with this issue (at least to start with.) If -policy is unable to come up with a reasonable consensus (or wants the ctte to decide between two conflicting proposals) it can be assigned back, but without a clear standard to decide between, a vote by the ctte is premature. If no one objects, I'll reassign this bug to -policy in the next few days. Don Armstrong -- The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair. -- Douglas Adams _Mostly Harmless_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
