On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Samuel Bronson<naes...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be really nice if ltrace supported not only > library-to-library calls as requested in #135985, but even calls to > libraries that were loaded dynamically by dlopen(). > > I don't see how this can be all that hard; if GDB can hook dlopen, why > can't ltrace?
Well, it's not so easy, but I will have a look at it. The problem is that, as far as I know, there is no PLT section in the executable corresponding to the symbols loaded by dlopen()... > Yes, I know -- you're going to ask me to do it, since I think it's so > easy. Maybe I will ;-). Thanks for your offer :) -- Juan Cespedes http://www.cespedes.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org