On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Samuel Bronson<naes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be really nice if ltrace supported not only
> library-to-library calls as requested in #135985, but even calls to
> libraries that were loaded dynamically by dlopen().
>
> I don't see how this can be all that hard; if GDB can hook dlopen, why
> can't ltrace?

Well, it's not so easy, but I will have a look at it.

The problem is that, as far as I know, there is no PLT section in the
executable corresponding to the symbols loaded by dlopen()...

> Yes, I know -- you're going to ask me to do it, since I think it's so
> easy. Maybe I will ;-).

Thanks for your offer :)

-- 
Juan Cespedes
http://www.cespedes.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to