> Zitat von Resul Cetin <resul-ce...@gmx.net>: > >> Am Sonntag 19 Juli 2009 17:59:55 schrieb Resul Cetin: > >> > Package name: gtk-kde4 > >> > Version: 0.9b > >> > Upstream Author: Yulian Konchunas <mu...@gala.net> > >> > URL: > >> > http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/gtk-kde4?content=74689 > >> > License: GPL2+ > >> > Description: theme engine using Qt 4 for GTK+2.x > >> > The GTK-Qt Theme Engine (also known as gtk-qt-engine) is a GTK+ 2 > >> > theme engine that calls Qt 4 to do the actual drawing. This makes your > >> > GTK+ 2 applications look almost like real Qt 4 applications and gives > >> > you a more unified desktop experience. > >> > . > >> > Please note that this package is targeted at KDE 4 users and > >> > therefore provides a way to configure it from within Systemsettings > >> > >> You can close this again as it is already available as > >> gtk-qt-engine-kde4. > > > > Sry for confusion, but this is another project. This is _not_ > > http://code.google.com/p/gtk-qt-engine/ > > Or is there a hidden "I want a different gtk-qt-engine-kde4" button > > hidden in dpkg? > > Do we really need two of them? What are the differences/advantages of > this one? If it is totally superior, can it replace the already > present one? gtk-kde4 is maintained and different people told that it fixes different bugs currently present in gtk-qt-engine-kde4. I am not sure about any regressions as I could not find a bug tracker or something like this for gtk-kde4.
I don't want to kill iceweasel when I want to restart it and don't want to use raw gtk look. Maybe to use gtk-kde4 is a good idea for me... or maybe not. If you think different about this rfp then feel free to close it as wontfix. Regards, Resul Cetin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
