On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 02:31:31AM +0800, Cai Qian wrote: > package: netkit-ftp > > Hello, > > I am the maintainer of netkit-ftp-ssl package. Recently, l found lots of > people complained about it conficting with other ftp clients, as it > doesn't use "alternatives". While netkit-ftp-ssl is just a fork from > netkit-ftp, so I would like to know what's your opinion about using > "alternatives" to handle multi ftp clients?
Hi Cai, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ which ftp /usr/bin/ftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/ftp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Mar 31 2004 /usr/bin/ftp -> /etc/alternatives/ftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/ftp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Mar 12 12:44 /etc/alternatives/ftp -> /usr/bin/netkit-ftp They seem to be already in place for netkit-ftp. Closing the bug. PS. BTW I don't see how this is 'severity important' -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | Formación, consultoría y soporte técnico agi@(inittab.org|debian.org)| en GNU/Linux y software libre Encrypted mail preferred | http://inittab.com Key fingerprint = 9782 04E7 2B75 405C F5E9 0C81 C514 AF8E 4BA4 01C3
