On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:30:05PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I refuse to maintain the security-hog called qemu for the next stable
> > release, so it can only come from a different source package.
> What's your suggestion? What source package? Could the "normal" package
> "qemu" be used for the job, or is there too many patches?
It should be built from the qemu source package eventually, but for now
its impossible due to the patches.
> Should a
> different source package be built out of the the xen-3.4.0.tar.gz just
> for qemu?
This should be a possible solution for now.
> While I understand that you don't want to maintain it (and you are
> giving a good reason for it), a big number of users will still need HVM
> support in Xen, and wont understand why Debian doesn't do it.
Sure, but I don't even have a machine were I can test this. My only
machine with VMX is my notebook, which does not work with current Xen.
> A solution
> has to be found, and it's unclear what you are suggesting here.
Sure. But I'm currently seeing a change in the attitude of the user
crowd. Bugs exists always, but I only started to get insulted by bug
reporters because I do things different then they think it should be
done.
Bastian
--
He's dead, Jim.
-- McCoy, "The Devil in the Dark", stardate 3196.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
