Daniel Moerner <dmoer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Peter S
> Galbraith<p.galbra...@globetrotter.net> wrote:
> > Ok, make sense. I will add some enabling code that can be used vis the
> > customization interface, similar to e.g. the variable
> > `ff-paths-install'.
> >
> > I will move alls etuup within quack.el to a new function which will be
> > invoked when this variable is set.
>
> I think Sami's logic that the changes are too invasive to be enabled
> by default sounds about right.
Thanks for confirming.
> Thanks for taking the lead on this, I just left town for a conference
> so it's difficult for me to do any work on this for the next week, but
> if you keep me CC'd I can try to find some time to test the changes
> you make.
Don't worry about it! Have fun at the conference.
> Neil is around on #scheme where I hang out normally so if it
> looks like there's a way to support quack.el better for autoloading
> rather than through always manually requiring it I can also pass those
> on to him.
That's a good idea. We'll try to integrate as much upstream as possible.
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Moerner <dmoer...@gmail.com>
Thanks Daniel,
--
Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer <p...@debian.org>
http://people.debian.org/~psg
GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
