-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > I just checked the template and it still contains the old phrase. Is > there something controversial with my suggested improvement? > > Since I've provided an alternative, I denote it on the bug status as > well. Hi! Sorry, but I'm not the maintainer of OpenLDAP2.3. You should try a member of Debian OpenLDAP Maintainers. Thanks - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKVjlLAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzHcQQAMELWXEl+qAJgoSJJ+uhTw33 qNYIiMtFLxpcFT+BbXf6RLymJ63xCv3ZnN0tDoIeFCpAERI3HsK63AkB/ZE/7jID KcKXyCqaCUiOzc5JknKW9NWExyHTE2bGi7wSdlOmOKrqn97h32vpSrhLe3/4wj4+ qPtOBMHwgJuEf+BTcSl8Ekc1Prm7GVJXy43G7lzA7h9XEhdklvFvazbG6QCgSXJn S8b3Q1mqZ2UkgoYu8/dLGcQdhtgfmajJ8f7n1Q2BsXzOI7pdnQhRAe9DIs74/FEp +J91/7nhOPdulhpL3VXHKb3t2JFwD/2wv/xSDcopc1pad1cliFEHJBu1Lq0KzNAs MF1HQKXzn7PRap+LQu3V/XKGDlWBVkcq7BuRYhD3k1VCIwdmeQAXiSaSN07q+5l5 30kX3m4u5S3ph8LtunPvKqGGctivM/kh66aIrgboH+OQoXMIDCwkHSftPDJxblPq CHvUC82InuQgKwyhaSrQqyUIyqUvOKaP9Wan/7WxTDNSLprhOpkqVrUUI+RCZkVy 7xSBQGo7AsRc4SHVrvpoaYRvcVDh8n3iJEuS4Nboqwu8XQ6OLQ78qEx3/ENrX5za X+UrIXPj05jgORmN9Ga941mjhbZivJpvM2UIExg8kyh/N11aZGK1TZmaw83dlRJI hlegGW0xrSxFZPzrDMr8 =lPLa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
