On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:16:57AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:00:25PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:31:21PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:04:58PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > I've run with these patches for several months now, and they work > > > > wonderfully. I get a DHCP lease far faster with these patches than > > > > without. Any plans to apply these patches, and to change the default > > > > dhclient.conf to take advantage of them? > > > > > > My general policy is not to deviate from upstream unless absolutely > > > necessary, so these patches should be sent upstream. > > > > I understand, and that seems sensible. Any plans to poke upstream about > > these patches? Any upstream bug-tracking system to which someone could > > send these patches? Or does "sent upstream" just mean "poke the mailing > > list and hope it doesn't get lost"? > > I'm having lunch with upstream next week. I am planning on going through all > of the open Debian bugs as well as the ones I've sent upstream to determine > the status of them.
Awesome! Thank you for maintaining the DHCP client packages. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
